Fri. Apr 23rd, 2021

Yumnam Marjit Singh vs State & Anr on 26 May, 2017

1 min read

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent present in the Court has been identified
to be the complainant in the FIR in question.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the
complainant/respondent no2 knew the petitioner since school days and
used to meet with him and was in a relationship with him, though they
used to have some quarrels now and then. The complainant now, after

Crl.M.C. 1988/2017 Page1 of 7
having some disputes with the petitioner does not wish to continue
being in a relationship with the petitioner and informed him of the
same, subsequent to which the petitioner abused the complainant in
filthy language and also threatened her with her life. Further, the
petitioner allegedly also threatened the complainant with making some
of her pictures public which he has in his possession.
The complainant after facing immense agony on account of the
behavior of the petitioner got registered the FIR in the present matter.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply