Thu. Apr 22nd, 2021

Yash Technologies Private … vs Ce Info Systems Private Limited on 19 June, 2017

1 min read

CM (M) 657/2017 & CM No.22602/2017(stay)

1. The petitioner impugns order dated 25.05.2017, whereby the

learned Additional District Judge has noticed that the petitioner has

CM(M) 657/2017 Page 1 of 4
not taken proper steps for summoning of the original arbitral record.

Petitioner has further been directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 12

lakhs within a period of ten days as against the arbitral award of

Rs.20 lakhs with interest besides cost of Rs.1 lakh.

2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel for the

respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was for the

learned Court to summon the arbitral record, as the petitioner had

written letters to the Arbitrator for transmitting the record to Court

and the Arbitrator had, on the letter of the petitioner, made an

endorsement directing the petitioner to get a requisition from the

Court to submit the Arbitral Record.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply