Workmen Of Dda vs Delhi Development Authority on 29 February, 2016

1. The present petitioners, i.e., Workmen, DDA (hereinafter referred

to as the „petitioner-workmen‟) have preferred the present Writ Petition

under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of

appropriate Writ, order or direction to set aside the impugned Award

dated 01.05.2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal No.

III, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „learned Labour Court/Industrial

Adjudicator‟) in I.D. No. 20/1997.

2. The brief facts stated are that the petitioner-workmen, i.e., Shri

Ramgopal Singh, Shri Adil Singh, Shri Rajinder Prasad, Shri Kartar

W. P. (C) No. 4690/2004 Page 1 of 10
Singh, Shri Kamal Kishore, Shri Hoshiar Singh, Shri Nepal Singh, Shri

Virender Singh, Shri Anil Kumar, Shri Prem Chand, Shri Amrinder

Kumar Singh, Shri Bhim Singh, Shri Yogender Kumar, Shri Ashok

Kumar, Shri Rakesh Kushwaha, Shri Babu Ram, Mohd. Sarfarajuddin

and Shri Ashok Kumar, whose cause of action has been exposed through

the D.D.A Mazdoor Union wherein the petitioner-workmen were

claiming the wages at par with the regular employees in the category of

pump operator for the duration of their muster roll employment, i.e., pay

scale of Rs. 260-350 revised to Rs. 950-1400 w.e.f. 01.01.1986.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*