Mon. Nov 30th, 2020

Vinod Saini vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. & … on 18 May, 2018

1 min read

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned order is
in contravention of Transfer Policy (Annexure P-7) and there is no
response to petitioner’s Representation (Annexure P-6).
Learned counsel for First Respondent submits that petitioner’s
transfer is due to immediate requirement of man power for the projects of
PSSR in the Southern Region. To submit so, copy of the Communication

W.P.(C) 5383/2018 Page 1 of 3
dated 17th April, 2018 of First Respondent has been handed over to the
Court along with another Communication of 27th April, 2018 to show that
petitioner’s transfer has the approval of not only the Unit’s head but even
of the higher ups also.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply