Tata Sons Private Limited vs Hakunamatata Tata Founders & Ors. on 26 October, 2021

1. A seminal issue arises for consideration in the present case.

2. The plaintiff is a company incorporated in India. Though the
plaint avers that documents showing involvement of the plaintiff, its
subsidiaries and group companies in financial services including
crypto currency, have been filed with the plaint, the documents with
the plaint do not indicate that the plaintiff is itself dealing in crypto
currency under any brand name or trade mark. They do indicate,
however, that the plaintiff is, under its well-known brand
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
CS(COMM) 316/2021 Page 1 of 22
Signing Date:26.10.2021
name/trademark “TATA”, providing a platform for trading in crypto

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply