Sushila Devi Jain vs Adesh Kumar Gupta on 11 December, 2016

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the present petitioner

filed an eviction petition against the respondent in respect of Shop

No.12/04, Yusuf Sarai, Main Market, New Delhi-16. It was stated in the

petition that the petitioner is aged about 87 years suffering from various

ailments and settled in Calcutta and because of the fact that she is old, she

RC. Rev. No.545/2015 Page 1 of 8
is not able to take care of her properties and had issued a special power of

attorney in favour of her son Devender Kumar Jain through whom the

petitioner herself has instituted the petition setting up the requirement of

Vaibhav Jain, son of Devender Kumar Jain, who happens to be the

grandson of the petitioner as the ground for retrieval of the shop during

the tenancy of the respondent. It was stated that Vaibhav Jain has done a

course in animation and graphic designing and is around 25 years of age.

The petitioner wants to settle her grandson by giving the said shop to him

after retrieval of the possession from the respondent so that he is able to

start his business of graphic designing and web designing. It was also

alleged that Vaibhav Jain and his father as well as the petitioner do not

own any alternate commercial accommodation in Delhi.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply