Sunny Sehgal & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 16 May, 2016

Crl.M.C. 463/2016 Page 1 of 9
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question
by SI Sachin Tomar.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage
between petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 was solemnized on
17.05.2011 as per Hindu rites and rituals. On the night of the marriage,
the husband of the complainant started to misbehave with her because
her parents did not buy a flat in his name. After marriage, the
petitioner no.1 and his family members started to harass and torture
the complainant. On 29.05.2011, the husband of the respondent no.2
and his family members made undue demands and threatened the
complainant. The petitioner no.1 kept forcing her for bringing
Rs.50,000/- from her parents. The husband of the complainant used to
abuse her, beat her and threaten her. On 25.08.2011, again the husband
of the complainant gave her beatings very badly and kicked her on her
stomach. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have
been residing separately since 14.02.2013.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*