Sudish Kumar & Ors vs State & Anr on 9 January, 2017

2. A complaint was made by respondent No.2 Sarabjeet Singh on 4 th
November, 2008 to the post-office alleging that one Manjit Singh along with
his associate Jagjit Advocate, Joginder Singh Chabra, his wife Smt Narender
Kaur, Sudish Kumar and his wife Urmil Arora etc., got prepared three fake,
forged and fabricated postal receipts bearing No. 0902, 0903 and 0904 all
shown to be issued on 15th May, 2006 with forged postal stamp (seal of the

CRL.M.C. 1959/2011 Page 1 of 6
District Court post-office) to show that service of one mandatory notice upon
Sarabjeet Singh had been effected despite the fact that no such notice was
sent or received and the said fake documents were prepared with the sole
motive to use them against Sarabjeet Singh in a Court case. After a
preliminary enquiry by the post-office, this complaint was forwarded to PS
Subji Mandi. Thus on the complaint of Senior Superintendent of Post
Office, FIR No. 76/2009 under Sections 468/476/465/471 IPC was registered
at PS Subji Mandi and after investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the
accused Manjit Singh without arresting him, whereas Jagjit Singh, Sudish
Kumar, Urmil Arora, Joginder Singh Chhabra and Smt. Narender Kaur were
kept in column No.12. As per the charge-sheet, during investigation postal
receipt bearing No. 0902, 0903 and 0904 were found to be fake and
fabricated having not been issued by District Court post-office and the
version of Manjit Singh during investigation was that he had misplaced the
receipt and could not produce the same though a mandatory notice dated 13 th
June, 2006 was prepared by his Advocate Jagjit Singh.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply