Thu. Mar 4th, 2021

Subhash Pandit vs State on 25 January, 2021

1 min read

1. The appellants have filed the present appeal, inter alia,
impugning a judgment dated 30.03.2016 passed by the ASJ-01(East),
Karkadooma Courts, New Delhi, whereby they were convicted of the
offences for which they were charged. Rekha (the appellant in Crl. A
518/2016) was convicted for the offences punishable under Section
109 read with Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter
‘IPC’) and Section 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956
(hereinafter ‘ITP Act’) and Subhash (the appellant in Crl. A No.
555/2016) was convicted for committing offences punishable under
Sections 366A, 376 and Section 109 read with Section 376 of the IPC
and Section 5 of the ITP Act.

2. The appellant, Rekha, impugns an order on sentence dated
26.04.2016, whereby she was sentenced to (i) four years of rigorous
imprisonment along with a fine of ₹1,000/- and in default of payment
of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for
committing the offence punishable under Section 109 read with
Section 376 of the IPC; and (ii) seven years of rigorous imprisonment
along with a fine of ₹1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to
undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month for
committing an offence punishable under Section 5 of the ITP Act. All
the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply