State (Nct Of Delhi) vs Pratap Singh @ Krishna on 25 May, 2016

1. Feeling aggrieved by acquittal of the respondent by learned Metropolitan
Magistrate (Mahila Court), South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi vide
order dated 03.09.2014 in case FIR No.489/2011 under S. 354 Indian Penal Code,
Police Station Govind Puri, the present appeal under S.378(1) (B) of Code of
Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the State.
2. The facts lie in a narrow compass. The complainant „X‟ had gone to gym
on 09.12.2011 at around 8.15 am where accused was an instructor. After 10.30
am, when all the girls from the gym had left, the respondent /accused came to her
and wanted to give massage to her on the ground that she was having pain while
doing gym. Despite her refusal, he forcibly started giving massage to the
complainant and while doing so, he pressed her thighs, touched her private parts
and her breast also. Police was informed. Her statement Ex.PW1/A was recorded
which resulted in registration of the instant FIR. During the course of
investigation, the respondent /accused was got arrested. After completion of
investigation, charge-sheet was submitted against him.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply