Solitary confinement of prisoners for extended periods ruled as unlawful

Supreme Court of United Kingdom: Deciding on appeals wherein the issues were whether the decisions
to keep the appellant prisoners in solitary confinement or segregation for
substantial periods were taken lawfully and whether the procedure followed met
the requirements of fairness, the Court unanimously granted a declaration in
each case that the appellant’s segregation beyond the initial period of 72
hours was not authorised by the Secretary of State and was accordingly
unlawful. The Court further criticized the conduct of the prison officials of
not providing reasons to the appellant prisoners for their continued
segregation.

In the instant
case, the first appellant was serving life sentence in HMP Whitemoore while the
second appellant was serving life sentence at HMP Frankland. Both the appellant
prisoners were kept in continued segregation after 72 hours. The decision of
segregation was made under the Prison Act 1952, Rule 45 of the Prison Rules
1999 and “PSO 1700”, a non-statutory document issued by the Secretary of State.
Paragraph (2) of Rule 45 provides that the prisoner shall not be segregated
under the rule for more than 72 hours “without the authority of the Secretary
of State” and that authority shall be given for a period not exceeding 14 days.
The appellants contended that their segregation was ordered without lawful
authority while it was argued on behalf of the Secretary of State that rule
45(2) permits Governors and other senior prison officers to take such
decisions, when authorised to do so by the Secretary of State, and that such
authority has been lawfully granted by the PSO.

After perusal of
the facts and the relevant rules, Lord Reed observed that it is implicit in
Rule 45(2) that the decision of the Secretary of State cannot be taken on his
behalf by the Governor, or by some other officer of the prison in question.
Thus, argument advanced on behalf of the Secretary of State that the expression
“the Secretary of State”, in rule 45(2), implicitly includes the Governor and
other officers of the prison, must also be rejected. The Court also emphasised
that Rule 45(2) is intended to provide a safeguard for the prisoner against
excessively prolonged segregation by the local prison management. [R v. Secretary of State for Justice,
[2015] UKSC 54, decided on 29.07.2015]

 
Source: Legal news India

Leave a Reply

*