Shyam Sunder vs Suraj Bhan on 7 October, 2015

% 07.10.2015

1. The case is listed before the Court by the Registry.

2. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff seeking

partition of some immovable and movable properties stated to be

owned by the HUF and the deceased father of the parties.

3. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that during the pendency

of the suit, the parties had filed a joint compromise application stating

inter alia that they had arrived at a settlement. Accordingly, vide

order dated 16.12.1999, the suit was decreed in terms of the

compromise. Thereafter, some proceedings had taken place for

valuation of the suit property and for awaiting the valuation reports.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply