Shyam Lal & Ors vs The State (N.C.T) Of Delhi & Anr on 17 October, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question
by her counsel.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage was
solemnized between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 on

Crl.M.C. 2266/2016 Page 1 of 9
09.12.2010. It is the case of the complainant that soon after their
marriage, the husband as well as in-laws of the complainant started
harassing her for dowry. Every now and then the accused persons used
to ask the complainant to leave the matrimonial home. On 20.02.2012,
the accused persons broke the electricity wire as well as water pipe
line of the house and shifted somewhere else, leaving the complainant
all alone in the matrimonial home. Thereafter, the parents of the
complainant came and took her back from the matrimonial home.
Since then the complainant has been living with her parents.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply