Wed. Apr 21st, 2021

Sheetal vs The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 3 March, 2021

1 min read

1. The appellants have filed the present appeal impugning a
judgment dated 01.11.2017, whereby the accused Sheetal (the appellant

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed CRL. A. 1181/2017 & CRL. A. 50/2018 Page 1 of 34
By:DUSHYANT
RAWAL
in CRL. A. 1181/2017) was convicted of committing an offence
punishable under Sections 21(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter the ‘NDPS Act’). The
accused Rakesh Dahiya (the appellant in CRL. A. 50/2018) was
convicted of an offence punishable under Sections 25 and 29 of the
NDPS Act. The appellants also impugn a common order of sentence
dated 16.11.2017, whereby the accused Sheetal was sentenced to serve
five years of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of ₹25,000/- and
in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
period of six months for committing an offence punishable under
Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act. In addition, she was also sentenced to
five years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of ₹25,000/- and in default
of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of
six months for committing an offence punishable under Section 29 of
the NDPS Act. It was directed that both the sentences would run
concurrently.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply