Sat. Jan 23rd, 2021

Seraj Ali vs Director Of Education & Anr. on 8 January, 2016

1 min read

CM No.583/2016 in LPA No.9/2016
CM No.585/2016 in LPA No.10/2016
CM No.587/2016 in LPA No.11/2016
CM No.589/2016 in LPA No.12/2016

Allowed subject to just exceptions.
LPA No.9/2016, LPA No.10/2016, LPA No.11/2016, LPA No.12/2016

1. The appellants in the above captioned appeals are employees of the
respondent No.2 school, which is an unaided private recognized school
under the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and the Rules
framed thereunder. Citing instances of employees working as a driver,
conductor or other class-IV category posts, appellants filed writ petitions
pleading that since the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 or the Rules
framed thereunder do not provide for termination of service by way of
retrenchment, declaration be granted that the respondent No.2 school is
bound to follow the procedure established by the Delhi School Education
Act, 1973 and the Rules framed thereunder in connection with the service
of the appellants. In other words what the appellants claim is that on the
justification that the post(s) held by them has been abolished on account of

LPA No.9/2016, LPA No.10/2016,
LPA No.11/2016, LPA No.12/2016 Page 2 of 5
non-availability of work, their services cannot be dispensed with.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply