1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner –
Sanjay Gupta to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated
09.12.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Crl.A. No. 34/2012 by which
the judgment and sentence order of learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC
No. 249/1under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act were upheld. The
revision petition is contested by the respondent.
2. During the proceedings, the matter was referred to Delhi High
Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. The matter has been settled there.
Settlement agreement dated 18.02.2015 has been received. Complainant /
respondent present in the Court has informed that the matter has been settled
and he has received the entire payment pursuant to that settlement. He has no
objection to the disposal of the revision petition as settled / compounded.
Source: Indian Kanoon