Rohit Srivastava vs State & Ors. on 16 May, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent nos.2 to 5, present in the Court have
been identified to be the victims/legal heirs of the complainant,
namely, late Sh. Mahender Paswan in the FIR in question by SI

Crl.M.C. 741/2016 Page 1 of 7
Madan Lal.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the FIR in question
was lodged by the complainant on the allegation that on 19.02.2012,
the complainant was going to Connaught Place from his house at
10.45 am and when he reached Mayur Vihar Phase-I, a car bearing no.
UP-32 DB-4587 which was being driven in a very rash and negligent
manner hit the vehicle of the complainant from the side. The
complainant fell down and caught the driver of the said car.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply