Rohit Singh & Anr vs Apple Inc on 4 July, 2018

2. The suit came up before this Court first on 1st March, 2016 when,
while issuing summons thereof, vide ex parte ad interim order the defendant
was restrained from using in any manner the trade mark of the plaintiffs
„SPLITVIEW‟ for any of the programmes and features within a programme
of the defendant or in any hardware or software sold by the defendant
directly or through dealers.

CS(COMM) 153/2016 Page 1 of 16
3. The defendant preferred FAO(OS)(COMM) No.11/2016 against the
order aforesaid of grant of ex parte injunction and the Division Bench, vide
judgment dated 7th April, 2016, vacated the ex parte ad interim injunction
pending the disposal of this application for interim relief.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply