Sat. Jan 23rd, 2021

Ram Singh vs The State (Gnct Of Delhi) on 4 February, 2016

1 min read

1. Vide the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks direction thereby granting
anticipatory bail in case FIR No.3/2015 registered at police station
Rajouri Garden for the offences punishable under Sections 420/120B/34
of the IPC.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that
petitioner has not played any role in duping any of the investors in the
scam, however he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the
disclosure statement of co-accused.
3. He further submits that City Club was owned by Raman Yadav,
however he disclosed before the Investigating Officer that Ram Singh and
Keshav Kumar are the main persons having the control over the City
Bail Appln No.628/2015 Page 1 of 5
Club. Thus, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. However, there
is no material against petitioner either signing of any of the documents or
bank transactions including the withdrawal of money from bank account
or even opening of the bank account. Moreover, there are no allegations
against petitioner by any of the investors that the petitioner has duped any
of them.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply