Tue. Sep 22nd, 2020

Rakesh Kumar Sachdeva vs Prem Arora on 22 July, 2015

1 min read

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Cav. 702/2015

Since the caveator had entered appearance, the caveat is
discharged.
C.M. No. 12288/2015 (Application for exemption)

Exemption is allowed, subject to just exception.
===============================================================

FAO (OS) 371/2015

1. This appeal arises out of order dated 15.04.2015 passed by a
learned single judge of this court dismissing O.A. No. 128 of 2015
filed by the appellant. By the O.A., the appellant had impugned the
order dated 09.02.2015 passed by the Joint Registrar closing the right
of the appellant/Plaintiff to lead evidence.
2. On 09.02.2015, the case was listed for further cross-
examination of the PW-1. (The Plaintiff in the suit and appellant
herein). The Joint Registrar noted that the PW-1 was not present. The
counsel for the plaintiff had submitted that the plaintiff had taken
away the file and he was not in contact. The counsel for the plaintiff
had submitted that he intended to seek discharge. The Joint Registrar
noted from the previous order sheets that PW-1 was not present on
previous dates of hearing also and accordingly the plaintiff’s evidence
was closed.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply