Sat. Jul 4th, 2020

Rahul @ Ganni vs State on 24 June, 2020

1 min read

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of six weeks in FIR
No.566/2018, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar under Sections
302/307/120B/109/114/115 IPC read with Sections 25/27 Arms Act
on the ground of medical condition of his brother.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no direct
role ascribed to the petitioner and petitioner is sought to be roped in
by applying Section 120B of the IPC. Learned counsel submits that

BAIL APPLN. 1252/2020 Page 1
there is no eye witness to the role ascribed to the petitioner and the
only witness on whose statement petitioner was sought to be roped in
has already declined to identify the petitioner.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply