Sat. Nov 28th, 2020

Radhey Shyam vs Varsha Yadav on 1 June, 2018

1 min read

1. Shri Radhey Shyam, Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter „Plaintiff‟)
entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 16th January, 2011 with the
Respondent/Defendant Smt. Varsha Yadav (hereinafter `Defendant’) for sale
of property admeasuring 300 square yards (60 ft. x 45 ft.) in Khasra No. 559
which is situated in the area of village Bhalswa, Jahangirpuri, Delhi, known
as Rajiv Nagar Extension Delhi (hereinafter „Suit Property) for a total sale
consideration of Rs.29,50,000/-.
2. The document executed was called as Bayana (Ikrar Nama). The
same is admitted by parties and is exhibited as Exhibit-P-1. It is claimed
that that the Defendant had also handed over the survey plan of the area
identifying the suit property which was marked as Exhibit PW-1/1. The

RFA 734/2016 Page 1 of 16
background link documents by which Smt. Varsha Yadav had purchased the
suit property i.e. the General Power of Attorney, Agreement to Sell, Deed of
Will, receipt of possession letter executed by one Shri Laxmi Narain were
also handed over to the Plaintiff and were marked as Exhibit P-3 to P-8.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply