Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing … vs Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt … on 25 October, 2016

1. The appellants, Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin)

Co. Ltd. & Ors., have challenged the order dated 26.08.2016 passed in

CCP(O) No.47/2015 in CS (OS) No.1431/2013 whereby, while

dealing with the application seeking initiation of contempt by the

plaintiff/respondent as against the appellant/defendant for having

FAO(OS) 257/2016 Page 1 of 12
violated the order of injunction dated 09.05.2014, held that the order

dated 09.05.2014 interdicted the use of the marks „ALLROUNDER‟

and „ALL-AROUND PROTECTION‟ for oral care products which

included toothbrushes also and not only toothpaste, as is being

claimed by the appellant/defendant. The learned single Judge, though,

did not punish or initiate contempt proceedings against the appellants

by giving them benefit of doubt, but at the same time cautioned them

for obeying the injunction with respect to toothbrushes also alongwith


Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply