Tue. Jul 7th, 2020

Pratibha Goyal vs Rahul Goyal on 23 June, 2020

1 min read

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. During the hearing, the Court had private interaction with the
child through video conferencing.

3. Petitioner seeks setting aside of order dated 02.06.2020 and
seeks granting of interim custody of the minor child for summer
vacation or upto continuation of the Lockdown.

4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that there
were visitation rights granted to the petitioner as well as interim

CM (M) 362/2020 Page 1 of 4
custody during summer vacation. However, in view of the Lockdown
position, the interim custody and summer vacation visitation rights
which were granted, could not take place.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply