Wed. Apr 21st, 2021

Pramod Kumar Jain And Anr. vs State Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr. on 31 May, 2017

2 min read

Mr. S.P. Jha, Advocate for
respondent No.2.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

1. A complaint case was filed by respondent No.2 as proprietor of M/s.
Tridev Construction & Consultants against the two petitioners and one S.K.
Agarwal alleging that on 8th May, 2006 the University had floated a tender
vide a newspaper advertisement for the purpose of renovation of toilets of
SES Jawahar Lal Nehru University. The complainant had participated in the
tender and thereafter an agreement was entered into between the parties.
However later he was informed by a corrigendum dated 28th February, 2007
that the rebate quoted in tender document dated 24th May, 2006 was
inadvertently taken as 1.25% instead of 21.25% and the said mistake was
due to an error. Complainant protested in respect of the corrigendum and
alleged that the documents have been forged and fabricated by the petitioners

CRL.M.C. 1777/2011 Page 1 of 6
and S.K. Aggarwal. He filed a complaint with the SHO PS Vasant Kunj on
30th April, 2007 on which no action was taken. Hence he filed a criminal
complaint before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate seeking directions to
the SHO to lodge the FIR. The said complaint was listed on 3 rd May, 2010
before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate when none appeared for the
complainant/respondent No.2 and was adjourned to 11th May, 2010. Even
on 11th May, 2010 despite the matter having been passed over twice and
taken up at 3.35 PM on the third call, none appeared on behalf of the
respondent No.2/complainant. Hence the complaint was dismissed in
default.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply