Phool Chand vs State on 2 May, 2016

2. According to the prosecution it proved fourteen circumstances to
convict the appellant of which except circumstance Nos.4 and 8, the learned
Trial Judge held that the same had been proved. However, to fill in the gap
in respect of circumstance Nos.4 and 8, the learned Trial Court pressed in

Crl.A.782/2000 Page 1 of 20
explanations under Section 313 Cr.P.C which were found to be false and
thus convicted the appellant. The circumstances pressed in by the
prosecution are:
“(1) That deceased Shanti Raj was an old lady, aged about
76 yrs.and was putting up alone at the ground floor at the
house No.R-901, New Rajender Nagar, and one Gopal was
working as a domestic help in her house.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*