Pankaj Solanki & Ors. vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & … on 24 July, 2018

1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1118/2015 under Sections
498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Prashant Vihar, based on a settlement.

2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Petitioner
No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the
father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. Petitioner No.4 is

CRL.M.C. 3636/2018 Page 1 of 3
the brother of the mother of the petitioner No.1. Petitioner No.5 is the
sister-in-law of the respondent No.2. Petitioner No.6 is the brother-in-law
of the respondent No.2.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
petitioner Nos.2 and 3 being aged could not be personally present in Court.
She prays for their personal exemption. She submits that the petitioner
Nos.5 and 6 being resident of Australia have executed attorney/authority
letter in favour of the petitioner No.1 and he represents petitioner Nos.5 and
6 also.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply