Palogix Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd & … vs Union Of India Ministry Of Railway … on 22 March, 2016

1. W.P.(C) No.6239/2013 was initially allowed by the learned Single
Judge by order dated 15.04.2015. However, on an application being C.M.
No.16562/2015 filed by the respondents seeking clarification of the order
dated 15.04.2015, the learned Single Judge recalled the order dated
15.04.2015 and directed to post the petition for hearing afresh. Aggrieved by
the said order in CM No.16562/2015 dated 29.09.2015, the petitioner in
W.P.(C) No.6239/2013 filed LPA No.701/2015.
2. Pursuant to the notice directed by us in LPA No.701/2015, appearance
has been entered on behalf of the respondents. After hearing the learned
counsel for both the parties to some extent, we thought that it would be
appropriate to hear the main writ petition itself instead of going into the
correctness of the recall order dated 29.09.2015 passed by the learned Single
Judge. The learned counsel for both the parties consented for the same and
accordingly, we have called for W.P.(C) No.6239/2013. Thus, the writ
petition has also been listed before us along with LPA.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply