Oswal Petrochemicals vs Union Of India And Ors. on 17 February, 2016

Through: Sh. Sarat Chandra with Sh. Sachin
Chandra, Advocates, for Respondent No.1.
Sh. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate, for Respondent
No.2.
Sh. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Advocate with Sh.
Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocates, for
Respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

%
1. The unsuccessful appellant is aggrieved by the decision of a learned
Single Judge, dismissing its writ petition. In those proceedings, the appellant
(hereafter “employer”) had challenged an order dated 13.04.2010 issued by
the second respondent (hereafter “PFC”) assessing its liabilities for the sum

LPA 667/2012 Page 1
of `43,38,921/- as provident fund contribution towards 43 employees for the
period from October, 1999 to January, 2004. The appeal to the Provident
Fund Appellate Tribunal [hereafter “the Tribunal”] by the present appellant
too was dismissed.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*