Fri. Apr 23rd, 2021

Noor @ Noor Mohd. vs State on 2 June, 2017

1 min read

2. Briefly facts stated are that on receiving information vide DD No.27-A,
ASI Ami Chand reached at the spot at Gali No.14, Viashwas Nagar, pertaining
to chain snatching and inquired about the same and recorded the statement of the
complainant on 16.08.2013 and registered FIR No.344/2013, under Sections
392/397/34 IPC. During the course of investigation, the appellant- Noor @ Noor
Mohd. was arrested on 18.08.2013 and recovery of Rs.2,000/- was got effected
from his house. Co-accused/convict Pankaj was also arrested who got recovered

Crl.A.17/2016 Page 1 of 4
Rs.1200/- from his house on 31.08.2013. Co-accused/convict Bhim was also
arrested on 08.09.2013 and weapon of offence used in the robbery was
recovered from his possession. After completion of the investigation, charge
sheet was filed under Section 392/397/411/34 IPC. After filing the charge sheet,
prosecution examined 6 witnesses in order to prove its case. In their defence, the
convict persons also examined 3 three witnesses. Upon appreciation of evidence
and after considering the contentions of the appellant and his associates, they all
were convicted by the impugned judgment. By an order dated 28.09.2015, the
appellant was awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine of
Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine he shall undergo six months simple
imprisonment. He was also awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for one year under
Section 506/34 IPC. All the sentences were to operate concurrently. Being
aggrieved and dissatisfied, the appellant has filed the instant appeal.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply