FAO(OS) 264/2014 Page 1 of 21
The challenge in the OMP was against allowing claim Nos.1 and 4. PWD
raised no challenge to either claim No.3 being allowed in favour of
Navayuga or rejection of the counter claim of PWD, however, by the
impugned judgment the learned Single Judge set aside the award in its
totality including claim Nos.3(a) to 3(f).
2. Thus we hold at the outset that since no objections to claim Nos.3(a)
to 3(f) for an amount of `2,90,39,805/- awarded were raised in the OMP, the
learned Single Judge could not have set aside the award. Thus the award qua
said claims is restored.
3. Claim No.1 before the Arbitrator was for work done. `23,86,75,025/-
was claimed as under:
Source: Indian Kanoon