Thu. Mar 4th, 2021

Naresh Dayal & Ors vs The Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd on 22 January, 2021

1 min read

123. Notice was also taken of another decision, in Sati Nath
Mukherjee v. Suresh Chandra Roy, (1941) 11 Com Cas 203,
wherein it was held that “a suit for declaration that the plaintiff
is a director and for the protection of his rights qua director is

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:JUSTICE
Signing Date:22.01.2021
CS (OS) No.3444/2015 Page
11:01:3117 of 27

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply