Narender Kumar & Ors. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 13 July, 2015

1. The petitioner’s case is that Lady Hardinge Medical College/

respondent no.3 and M/s. M.S. Vigilant Security/respondent no.4 had

entered into the agreement dated 15.07.2009 for providing Security Guards

to respondent no.3. The petitioners have been working as security guards

pursuant to the said agreement and they have been continuously discharging

their duties since 2009. They have been regularly paid their wages in time

but from the last two years, there was interruption/delay in payment of

wages but despite that they continued to work for respondent no.3.

Respondent no.4, the Contractor had not paid them the wages. The wages

were also not paid by respondent no.3, the principal employee.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply