Tue. Nov 24th, 2020

Mukesh @ Kirpal vs State on 15 June, 2018

2 min read

1. The appellant/applicant Mukesh @ Kirpal s/o Sudan Singh vide
the present Criminal Appeal No. 959/2004 assails the impugned
judgment dated 21.08.2004 in Sessions Case No. 43/02 in relation to
FIR No.750/01, PS Paschim Vihar wherein he was held guilty and
convicted qua the offence punishable under Sections
392/394/397/384/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and vide the
impugned order on sentence dated 23.08.2004, was sentenced to

CRL.A 959/2004 Page 1 of 11
undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 7 years and to pay a
fine of Rs.500/- and in default of the payment of the fine to further
undergo SI for a period of one month qua the offence punishable
under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was also
sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years, to pay a fine of
Rs.500/- and in default of the payment of the fine to further undergo
SI for a period of one month qua the offence punishable under Section
394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was further sentenced to
undergo RI for a period of 7 years qua the offence punishable under
Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was also sentenced to
undergo RI for a period of 3 years, to pay a fine of Rs.100/- and in
default of the payment of the fine to further undergo SI for a period of
10 days qua the offence punishable under Section 384 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 with it having been directed that all the sentences
would run concurrently with the benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C.,
1973 having been given to the convict, i.e., the appellant herein.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply