Tue. Nov 24th, 2020

Ms Shoes East Ltd vs Delhi Development Authority on 17 May, 2018

1 min read

2. The application came up before this Court first on 24th November,
2016 when notice thereof was ordered to be issued. The plaintiff filed
another application being IA No.15697/2016 seeking deferment of the
recording of evidence in the suit till the decision of this application. IA
No.15697/2016 came up before this Court on 19th December, 2016, when it
was the contention of the counsel for the defendant DDA that the plaintiff,
inspite of repeated opportunities had failed to lead evidence and the plaintiff,
being unable to lead evidence, had filed IA No.15697/2016. In the face of
CS(OS) No.86/2011 Page 1 of 35
such contention, the recording of evidence as scheduled was not deferred as
sought by the plaintiff. No reply to the application has been filed by the
defendant DDA despite opportunity. The senior counsel for the plaintiff and
the counsel for the defendant DDA were heard on 2nd May, 2017 and
judgment reserved.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply