1. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondent was the
defendant before the learned Single Judge. We shall be referring to the
parties by their nomenclature in the suit.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, relevant facts for the purposes of
adjudication of the present appeal are that the plaintiff filed a suit for
recovery of `66,72,626/- (Rupees Sixty Six Lakhs Seventy Two
Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty Six only) together with interest @
15% per annum on the original side of this Court against the defendant :
Delhi Jal Board.
3. Concise, case of the plaintiff was:-
a) On May 10, 2006, the plaintiff a sole proprietorship concern was
awarded work of „providing and laying 800 mm diameter rising
RFA (OS) No.48/2015 Page 1 of 41
main/feeder main from Vikas Marg to Vishwakarma Park (Geeta
Colony), UGR & BPS in Trans Yamuna Area‟ vide order No.1/2006-2007
by the defendant.
Source: Indian Kanoon