Fri. Apr 23rd, 2021

M/S Rohtak Road Transport Centre … vs Delhi Development Authority … on 24 May, 2017

1 min read

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff

impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 6.3.2017 by

which the first appellate court accepted the appeal filed by the

defendant in the suit and set aside the judgment of the Trial Court

dated 24.11.2015 by which the trial court while dismissing the suit of

the appellant/plaintiff for one relief of grant of alternative allotment

however decreed the suit for the second relief that the members of the

appellant/plaintiff association should not be dispossessed without due

RSA No. 147/2017 Page 1 of 5
process of law from their portions which they are occupying in DDA

Parking, Rohtak Road Transport Centre, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi-35. I

may note that the appellant/plaintiff did not file any appeal against the

judgment of the trial court dated 24.11.2015 by which the trial court

dismissed the suit by refusing to grant the prayer for alternative plots

being granted to the members of the appellant/plaintiff.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply