M/S. Prakash Atlanta Jv vs National Highways Authority Of … on 8 February, 2016

1. The Arbitral Tribunal published an award on August 05, 2014. It was
received by the respondent on a date not known because neither counsel
could through light thereon, but certainly towards the end of August 2014,
because both parties filed applications under Section 33 of the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the Act’)
somewhere towards the end of the month, because the Section envisages
clerical, typographic, computation errors and errors of the kind being made;
probably because humans are prone to commit unintentional errors. Further,

FAO(OS) No.476/2015 Page 1 of 13
because humans are prone to errors of language, the provision envisages a
correction thereof, inasmuch as parties may request the Arbitral Tribunal to
give an interpretation of a specific point or part of the award.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply