Mon. Nov 30th, 2020

M/S. G4S Facility Services India … vs Regional Provident Fund … on 31 May, 2018

1 min read

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA

MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

%

1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of a learned single judge, declining to
interfere with the decision of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour
Court No.1, Delhi (hereafter “Tribunal”) under Section 7-O of the Employees Provident
Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 (in short “the EPF Act”) in its appeal. The
appellant had sought stay of order passed by the Employees Provident Fund Commission
(in brief “EPFC”), dated 06.01.2018 under Section 7-A of the EPF Act. Such interim stay
was given subject to the appellant depositing 50% of the amount determined to be due
from it; it sought an order, of complete waiver, in its writ petition.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply