1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the
petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated
06.11.2015 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in CA No.32/15 by
which the judgment dated 14.07.2014 and sentence order dated
17.07.2014 of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate were upheld. The
Crl.Rev.P.791/2015 Page 1 of 3
petitioner was convicted under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
and was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months with
compensation amount of `3,00,000/-.
2. During the course of arguments, Crl.M.A.No.18454/2015
was filed to report settlement between the parties. The complainant with
his counsel appeared and stated that the matter has been compounded by
him with the petitioner with his free consent and the settled amount has
since been received. He has no objection to the disposal of the revision
petition as settled/compounded.
Source: Indian Kanoon