Mr. Surya Kant Tyagi vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 26 July, 2018

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.69/2018 under Sections
354A/509 of the IPC at Police Station Connaught Place, New Delhi.

2. It is alleged that the petitioner misbehaved with the complainant
who had come to Connaught Place along with her family. The
petitioner has apologised to the complainant. They have entered into a
settlement dated 20.07.2018. Petitioner has also apologised to the

CRL.M.C. 3667/2018 Page 1 of 2
3. Respondent No.2 who is present in court in person is identified
by the Investigating Officer, she confirms that she has settled with the
petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the petitioner.

4. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioner and
respondent No.2 have been settled, continuation of criminal
proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case
demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and
peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate
guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the
consequent proceedings emanating there from.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply