Mohd. Naved & Ors vs State & Anr on 4 April, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question

Crl.M.C. 33/2016 Page 1 of 9
by SI Mohd. Farhaz.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage
between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 was solemnized
on 16.03.2013 according to Muslim rites and customs. All the dowry
articles presented at the time of the marriage were handed over to
Sheikh Mohd. Rasheed Qureshi. Just after the marriage, the accused
persons started to taunt the complainant that she had not brought the
dowry articles as per their expectations. They even threatened the
complainant to bring a four wheeler from her parents. The husband of
the complainant was suffering from depression and thus, Modh.
Sharik started obscene gestures towards the complainant. The
complainant complained about the same to her father-in-law who
asked her to keep quite. Later, on the instance of Mst. Nafa, the
complainant was turned out from her matrimonial home and also
turned out the husband of the complainant out of the house and asked
him to demand property from the parents of his wife.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*