Mohd Mujahid vs Smt Shifat Nahid & Anr on 1 April, 2016

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
submitted that the respondent No.1, present in the Court has been
identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question

Crl.M.C. 4379/2015 Page 1 of 9
by her counsel.
3. The factual matrix of the present case is that the marriage
between the petitioner and the respondent no.1 was solemnized on
28.11.2005. The complainant came know that her husband in having
illicit relation with a girl. The complainant tried to stop him but he did
not listen to her. On 08.05.2010, the petitioner brought the said girl to
the house and forcefully made the complainant drink alprex tablets.
The complainant was semi-conscious and she informed her brother
about the same who took her to the hospital.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply

*