Mohd Bilal Qureshi vs State on 3 June, 2016

1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 12.09.2014 of

learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 27/14 arising

out of FIR No. 113/14 PS Sadar Bazar by which the appellant Mohd.

Bilal Qureshi was convicted for committing offences under

Sections 366/376(2)(n)/506 IPC. By an order dated 12.09.2014 he was

sentenced to undergo various prison terms.

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet

was that the appellant repeatedly committed rape upon ‘X’ (assumed

name) against her consent. Written complaint (Ex.PW-2/A) lodged by ‘X’

on 28.02.2014 formed the basis of First Information Report registered on

same day. ‘X’ was medically examined; she recorded her statement under

Crl. Appeal No.327/2015 Page 1 of 10
Section 164 Cr.P.C. Statements of the witnesses conversant with the

facts were recorded. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet

was filed against the appellant for commission of offences under

Sections 366/376(2)(n)/506IPC. The prosecution examined eight

witnesses to substantiate its case. In 313Cr.P.C statement, the appellant

denied his involvement in the crime and pleaded false implication. He

admitted about his friendship with the prosecutrix. He stated that he had

no physical relations with the prosecutrix. On 26/27/02/2014 he was

noticed by husband of the prosecutrix when he was roaming with the

prosecutrix. He did not examine any witness in defence. The trial

resulted in conviction as aforesaid. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, the

appellant has filed the instant appeal.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply