Mohan Singh Market & Ors. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 19 November, 2015

1. Neither the counsel for the petitioners nor the counsel for the

respondent No.3 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (DMRC) are present.

‘Non-main’ counsels appearing on behalf of both have no instructions or

knowledge of the facts of the case and merely seek a passover.

2. The matter is unlikely to reach if passed over. The petition being old,

cannot be adjourned. The file has been perused with the assistance of the

counsel for the respondents No.1&4 Union of India (UOI) and the counsel

for the respondent No.7 South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC). None
W.P.(C) No.4369/2013 Page 1 of 8
appears for the respondents No.2,6&8 Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD),

Deputy Commissioner of Police and Central Public Works Department

(CPWD) also. The counsel for the respondent UOI states that he has no

instruction from the respondent No.8 CPWD.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply