Tue. Sep 22nd, 2020

Media banned from publishing any statement relating to bandh, strike, rallies

2 min read

Meghalaya High Court: Taking a serious note of the impact of bandhs
on the life and livelihood of the citizens of Meghalaya, a three Judge bench of
Uma N. Singh CJ, T.N. Singh and S.R. Sen JJ came down heavily against the bandh
culture prevailing in the State and directed the
Government of Meghalaya to issue notice to all shops and business
establishments especially the medical shops, hotels and taxi owners as to why
their licences shall not be cancelled for staying away from their lawful
avocation and for keeping their establishments closed despite repeated Press
Release/Communiqué of assurance issued by the State Government that they shall
be provided adequate protection on their place of occupation/business.

The Court noted that on account
of 48 hours bandh in the State by the organisation namely “Hynniewtrep National
Liberation Council” (HNLC) which is said to have been banned as unlawful
association by the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal, Delhi the even tempo of otherwise peaceful public life has
been badly disturbed. The Court relied on full bench decision in the case of Bharat Kumar K Palicha v. State of Kerala 1997
SCC OnLine Ker 134, which was upheld
by the Supreme Court in the case of Communist
Party of India (M) v. Bharat Kumar (1998)
1 SCC 201 and stated that “bandh” violates the fundamental rights of common
citizens as guaranteed in Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and that
the political parties and organizations can be asked to recoup the loss and
damages suffered by the citizens of their lives and private properties, and by
the Government in the case of damage to public properties. The Court further
stated that the essential services shall always remain available in all
eventualities, and in case of necessity, the District Administration can be
authorized to call Para military force to deal
with the situation.

The Court observed that the major
problem of disturbance in the public life was that the statements issued by the unlawful organisations were given undue publicity
and coverage, both in print and electronic media which created fear in the mind
of common citizens, and accordingly directed the media to restrain from
publishing any statements relating to strike,
Bandh, Hartal, Road Blockade and holding of Rallies with unlawful design issued
by/ or in the name of any organisation which may have the effect of disturbing
the even tempo of public life in the State of Meghalaya. The Court further
directed the Secretary/Director of Information
and Publicity of Government of Meghalaya, to ensure wide publicity of this
order in print and electronic media so that the common citizens are encouraged
to return to their normal life and get strength of courage to pursue their
regular avocation without any element of fear. [Registrar General v. State of Meghalaya, 2015 SCC OnLine Megh 55,
decided on 27.05.2015]
Source: Legal news India

Leave a Reply