Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd vs M/S Unitech Ltd on 9 May, 2018

2. The brief facts as alleged by the petitioner/objector are as follows:-
a) the petitioner – Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
(MTNL) awarded a work to the respondent for construction of
telephone exchange at 9, CGO Complex, New Delhi, vide an
Agreement dated 04.09.1992;

O.M.P.(COMM) No.461/2016 Page 1 of 11
b) certain disputes arose between the parties and learned
arbitrator was appointed on 12.03.1997, who entered the reference
on 30.04.1997 and gave an award on 28.1.2000;
c) MTNL filed a petition O.M.P 91/2000 under Section 34 of
the Act challenging the Award in this Court, decided vide
judgment dated 23.11.2009 wherein it was observed:-

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply