Sat. Jan 23rd, 2021

M.T.Kom vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 19 February, 2016

1 min read

1. The present petition has been directed against the summoning order
dated 11.01.2011, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate summoned
the petitioner under Section 506(I) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’).

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.2 filed a case under
Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) and
complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C., however, the learned Magistrate
declined to issue directions under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and directed the
respondent No.2 to lead evidence. Accordingly, the said respondent

Crl.M.C.No.670/2013 Page 1 of 10
examined himself as CW1 and Shri Jagdish Prasad as CW2.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply