Lali Devi vs Ravi & Anr on 21 May, 2018

2. The other appeal bearing Criminal Appeal No.753/2015
has been filed by the complainant-Smt.Lali Devi under Section 372
Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction with the prayer to set aside
the acquittal of the accused Ravi under Section 302 IPC.

3. Since both these appeals have been preferred against the
same judgment of conviction and order on sentence, therefore, they
both were heard simultaneously, and are decided together.

4. The factual matrix emerging from the record is that on
the intervening night of 26/27.09.2011, the complainant Smt.Lali
came to the police station and made a complaint that on 18.09.2011, at
about 05.30 p.m., her son Pradeep @ Golu along with his brother
Sandeep went for fishing at 5th Pushta, Yamuna Khadar, Usmanpur.
Sandeep returned back without Pradeep. On 19.09.2011, her husband
Mohd.Tasleem made a complaint regarding Pradeep going missing in

Crl.A. 833 & 753 of 2015 Page 2 of 11
the police station vide DD No.16A. On inquiry from Sandeep, it was
revealed by the complainant that Pradeep was lastly seen with an
unknown person who was found to be a resident of Gali No.8, 3rd
Pushta, Usmanpur and his name was Ravi. She gave the description
of her missing son Pradeep aged about 14-15 years.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply