Thu. Apr 22nd, 2021

Judge Kumar @ Deepak vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi on 19 May, 2017

1 min read

2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge-
sheet was that on 26.06.2013 in between 07.15 a.m.to 7.25 a.m. in school
van from I-2/6,7, Sector-16, Rohini to Sachdeva Public School, Rohini, the
appellant sexually assaulted the prosecutrix ‘X’ (changed name) aged around
fifteen years. The information regarding the occurrence was conveyed to the
police on 27.06.2013. The investigation was assigned to SI Suresh Chand
who after recording victim’s statement (Ex.PW-2/A) lodged First
Information Report. ‘X’ was taken for medical examination; she recorded her
164 Cr.P.C. statement. The appellant was arrested. Statements of the
witnesses conversant with the facts were recorded. Upon completion of
investigation, the appellant was charge- sheeted. In order to establish its
case, the prosecution examined ten witnesses. In 313 Cr.P.C. statement, the
accused denied his involvement in the crime and pleaded false implication
due to previous quarrels with victim’s grandmother. The trial resulted in
conviction as aforesaid. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied, the appellant has
preferred the instant appeal.

Source: Indian Kanoon

Leave a Reply